« December 2008 | Main | February 2009 »

January 19, 2009

A recipe for tuna salad

Turns out my brother is pretty smart. And better yet he's been good enough to share some of his secrets with me over the years. For example, I asked him how to develop some discipline and he recommended starting with something small like keeping my apartment tidy, picking up at the beginning/end of the day (Still working on this). 

 

Now one day, I was belly aching about being too round (or fat as I call it as I slowly loose site of my belt). He didn't lecture me about good nutrition and working out, he just mentioned that his daily routine is a bit of cardio in the morning to listen to his podcasts/books on tape and then a couple of tuna sandwiches throughout the day. But instead of saying "tuna sandwich", he said "gourmet tuna salad".  Which sounds great.

 

I'm actually a fan of gourmet tuna salad and have made some good stuff in the past, but hadn't really bothered with anything recently. Like in the past 5 years. Maybe ten. The first batch I made failed due to the lousy can opener that wouldn't.  Soggy tuna want you not. And I made it more soggy will poorly drained crushed tomatoes.  So burned by that experience was I, that it was another month before I tried again.

 

And it is a good thing I did. Cause the recipe below is the most ultimate delicious tuna salad experience ever. Period. (That's MUDTSEE. for short)

 

Seems pretty standard... tuna, red onion, celery, chop mix... but what sets it off is the Dijon mustard. Now, I don't really care for mayo.  No mayo, no soda are the last vestiges of my don't sacrifice mayo/soda at the temple theory developed in the early '90s. So I've always used Grey Poupon in my tuna salad. And it was good. But this time... this time I had legit french dijon. Like from Dijon. Don't ask how I got it (ok it was at the store), but I'd had this for... ooh 3 years? Even travelled in the great move in September when I migrated downtown. Its getting old, perhaps that was the secret, truly aged Dijon mustard. So future but now today expiration date almost came and went (though I don't think mustard goes bad, fingers crossed) and I mixed that into my tuna/onion/celery and creamed and creamed and mixed and mixed, added some more tuna (4 cans eventually) and lo... at the end I had a beautiful, fragrant, crunchy delicious lunch time treat. I had created MUDTSEE. 

 

And there was great rejoicing. It is so good that I had it for breakfast the next day. And I still have some left (actually that was the plan as per brothers instructions you make batch o' tuna salad for the week) and I'll be happily savoring the textures and flavors for at least two more days.

 

So shorter version, find the best dijon you can, stick it at the back of your fridge, pull it out 3 years later and have some MUDTSEE. in my brother's honor. 

[ Yahoo! ] options

January 17, 2009

Ancient Greek Philosophers and Big events

Philosopher

Date
Event

 

490 BC
Marathon (Darius defeated)
Protagoras Born
480 BC
Thermopylae, Salamis

 

479 BC
Plataea (Xerxes defeated)
Socrates Born
469

 

 

461 BC
First Peloponnesian War Starts (Perikles 460-429)
Thucydides Born
460

 

 

458 BC
Aeschylus produces "the Oresteia" trilogy of tragedies (Agamemnon, Libation Barers, Eumenides) in Athens

 

446 BC
30 Yr Treaty between Sparta/Athens
Xenophon Born
431 BC
30 years passes really fast, PW starts again
Plato Born
427

 

 

421 BC
Peace of Nicias

 

418
Mantinea (Sparta beats Athens)
Protagoras Dies
411

 

 

404
End PW, Athens surrenders to Sparta

 

401
Cunaxa, 10,000 march back to Greece (Anabasis)
Trial Execution of Socrates
399

 

Thucydides Dies
395

 

Aristotle Born
384

 

 

359
Philip II, King of Macedonia
Xenophon Dies
355

 

Plato Dies
347

 

 

338
Chaeronea (Philip defeats Athens)

 

336
Philip II assassinated, Alexander becomes king

 

334
Granicus

 

333
Issus

 

332
Tyre

 

331
Gaugamela

 

326
Alexander in India

 

323
Alexander dies
Aristotle dies
322

 

 

[ Yahoo! ] options

January 12, 2009

Signs, signs, everywhere there are signs

I've been quite popular at work today. The phone ringing off the hook. Striving to provide quality information and assistance to those less fortunate.  After a short call (they hung up after I said hello), my neighbor offered me a frosted mini wheat from her tupperware snack box. If you do not know frosted mini wheats, you should go buy some. They are delicious. Shredded wheat biscuits (size: mini) with frosting on one side, just enough sweetness to make you smile and the fiber you need to make you... smile.  Sometime in the past (I can't say if it was the 80's or 90's as I get them confused) there were FMW commercials that played up the dual nature of the cereal, the sweet side represented by a small child and a serious side represented by an adult (imagine, cowboy, policeman, teacher etc, eating cereal but then becoming a child when they savor the sweetness).  I more sinisterly envisioned a jekyll and hyde transformation as I watched her advance w/ the tupperware and treats... plunging my hand in with out looking I grab a tasty morsel and .... find... no frosting, just shredded wheat. Still tasted great. And I didn't become a child. But the adult part is still disappointing.

[ Yahoo! ] options

Hyperbole is always the best policy

Have been watching Anne Coulter on the talk shows promoting Guilty (available at Amazon and other fine book selling huts) and everyone seems to ask a variation of the "does your over the top persona/tone turn people off and keep them from seeing/reading the valid points you make?" question. 

I don't think she's really answered the question yet (she is actually getting pummelled most of the time by the interviewer so she focuses on going back to saying, I have a new book, check it out), so I'll give my answer.

Hyperbole is a key literary/dialogue/marriage arguing technique as it helps to identify those who are interested in ideas and those who are interested in semantics. In other words, those with open minds and those who aren't ready to challenge their own assumptions so they focus on when you said always or never.  The use of hyperbole is distressing and divisive and it is meant to be. 

One can either complain about hyperbole or recognize that all we can control as individuals is ourselves and we should then strive to stop our urge to say, "Nuh uh, I don't ALWAYS argue with you when you ask that I slow down" and instead see the underlying issue/idea at hand, which is that I tend to ignore my wife's valid and reasonable request to slow down. 

Getting past the hyperbole is tough. Mostly because it means actually finding and then considering the core of the point presented and perhaps even changing ones own mind. As Plato said Socrates said it is far more difficult to BE persuaded than to persuade. 

Therefore, it is not up to a person to tone down their rhetoric and make it more palatable for us, rather we must not let ourselves be diverted by loud noises or flashing lights and take the time to see beyond the distraction to the ideas that are being presented, because often times there are important new perspectives and propositions hiding in the hyperbole.

(The central idea of personal responsibility is also true in criticism: it isn't that one demand others criticize nicely, we should see past the name calling and yelling and focus on the actual observation/criticism being made)

[ Yahoo! ] options


Hosting by Yahoo!